<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Evaluation on Nyghtowl</title>
    <link>https://nyghtowl.com/tags/evaluation/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Evaluation on Nyghtowl</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>&lt;a href=&#34;https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;CC BY-NC-SA 4.0&lt;/a&gt;</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:57:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://nyghtowl.com/tags/evaluation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Your Fine-Tuned LLM Model Isn’t Ready Yet: Here’s How to Evaluate It</title>
      <link>https://nyghtowl.com/posts/2025/12/your-fine-tuned-llm-model-isnt-ready/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://nyghtowl.com/posts/2025/12/your-fine-tuned-llm-model-isnt-ready/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://youtu.be/4Z0PvxWta2I&#34;&gt;Video&lt;/a&gt; &amp;amp; &lt;a href=&#34;https://youtu.be/dp57oO5p4LI&#34;&gt;Podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Fine-tuning large language models has become dramatically easier. With techniques like QLoRA, teams can adapt billion‑parameter models on relatively modest hardware and get impressive results quickly. But this ease hides a trap: &lt;strong&gt;a model that finished training is not the same thing as a model that’s ready for production.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Many teams run a few spot checks, feel good about the outputs, deploy, and only discover weeks later that the model has drifted, slowed down, hallucinated, or lost user trust. The gap between “it trained successfully” and “it’s safe to ship” is wide, and closing it requires a testing mindset different from traditional software QA.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
